You can't use figures like this when that 95% couldn't caer less. It's more like PNW players are better than perhaps 35% of ITG/DDR players out there.ģ) Most of us are not consistent enough to be good. I suck because I lack consistency.Ĥ) You can't make a comparison between us and people who just walked on a pad.ĥ) People say we are good because they don't have a critical eye for what makes a good player. If you look closely, I said that I'm guilty of saying that I suck a lot. I am one of the worst forum-using players in the PNW and I know that from tournaments and score comparisons.ġ) There are different levels of good. Just because we may not hold the same opinion doesn't mean I DON'T know what good is. If good is being consistent on your Summer score between 20 and 18 Excellents, I would tend to say you're better than just "good". In fact, adjectives such as "great" or "masterful" would probably not be out of the question. Why is FC'ing LoM NOT good anymore? Many of us can or have done it on these boards. Is that not good? I know that good is a somewhat relative adjective, and to some extent I addressed that, but saying I don't know what "good" really is isn't completely fair.Ģ) I never said people truly cared how good we were believe it or not. All of my friends hate it when I talk anything about DDR or make sure to avoid arcades at all costs when they're around me because they think DDR is the stupidest thing ever and couldn't care less that I can play it at the level I do. That being said, all of my friends consider my "good" or "crazy" at DDR.
0 kommentar(er)
